Thursday, May 26, 2016
Soft Skills Again? Or Still? Really?
If you've been in the workforce for more than a few days, you've probably heard all about the need for soft skills. I can hardly open up LinkedIn without finding a post or an article on the importance of soft skills in business.
Are they really that important? Isn't it more important to have skills? And certifications? And education?
Well, yes and no.
Skills and a pedigree are valuable and oftentimes necessary; however, skills can be taught, and an education can be attained. But soft skills are fundamental, and most employers are not able or willing to spend time and money to help employees develop them.
In the previous post, I indicated that I hired photographers for many years, and I always valued the soft skills, like artistry and customer service, over the hard photography skills. Our studio could teach the skills, and, in fact, we often wanted to teach skills that aligned with our style and habits. On the other hand, we couldn't teach creativity and an artistic eye. Those talents take years to develop, and they are intensely personal. Additionally, we didn't want to teach customer service because we believed that people either knew how to treat others with kindness or respect or they didn't. If they didn't, we were not interested in bringing them on board to represent our studio.
For us, soft skills were not just important; they were non-negotiable.
While the list of soft skills traits can vary from person to person, in general, they include the following qualities:
1. Solid Communication
2. Critical thinking or problem-solving
3. Teamwork
4. Flexibility
5. Time management
6. Dependability
7. Decision-making
8. Leadership
9. Self-motivation
10. Humor
These are just a few. I've seen lists with many more qualities, but, in general, soft skills are inherent qualities that people have that will make them likely to be successful employees.
Communication and critical thinking are fundamental for soft skills as well as hard skills, so I plan to spend time discussing both in depth. Ultimately, though, improving any or all of these qualities in ourselves will not only make us valued employees, but it will help us grow personally as well. That's a bonus that is too good to pass up, right?
An intro to Audience Awareness
Several years ago, I was just about to purchase my very
first new car. I had chosen the make and model, I had negotiated in a way that
would make my dad proud,
and I was ready to close the deal. We were half-way through the paperwork when
we hit a snag. I had my heart on a champagne color car, but the dealership had
none in stock. The salesman became nervous, realizing that the deal was about
to fall through. He couldn’t find my color anywhere, and he was determined to
save the sale. He finally became frustrated with me and insisted that I buy a
blue car that was in stock. I became frustrated, too, and asked him why I
should consider the blue car. His answer? “Because blue is MY favorite color.”
Umm, really? The salesman apparently had decided that my
needs were less important than his sale. Unfortunately for him, I didn’t feel the same.
My experience is a great example of one of the most
important considerations in communicating: audience awareness.
Over the years, my English students have heard me utter that
phrase countless times. And for good reason.
Understanding our audience is vital to communication if you hope
to have your message received successfully. Specifically, what is it that they need to
hear/understand and HOW does it need to be delivered it in order for you to
accomplish your objective? That understanding should inform every step you take
in the communication process, from brainstorming to delivery and follow-up.
Everything.
Yet it can be the most difficult thing to understand. If we
are communicating with others, we think that what we need to say is the
important thing. We yearn to tell our listeners what is on our mind. We think
they should buy the blue car because it is our favorite color.
But that rarely works.
Think about this especially when you are writing a resume.
We often make the mistake of thinking that we need to create resumes that tell
the reader what we’ve done, but I would argue that doing so is a huge mistake.
Instead, write with the potential employer in mind. Read the
job announcement carefully. Analyze it. Usually, you can see a theme emerge
that reveals the skills, experiences, or qualities that the employer thinks are
the most important, so tailor the resume to address those needs. What can you
do for the employer? That’s what he or she wants to know.
As a photography studio owner, I interviewed a lot of
applicants. I also wrote the job opening announcements, and I always emphasized
that artistry and client service were the most important skills, even more so
than photography knowledge. I knew that we could teach someone the basics of
photography, but artistry can’t be taught, and I had neither time nor
inclination to teach someone how to treat people with respect.
Yet, I routinely got resumes that started with a listing of
the equipment the person could use. They tried to impress me with what they
felt was important instead of trying to understand what I indicated was
necessary.
If you’re lucky enough to get an interview, make sure you
continue being aware of audience and focus on the needs of the employer. Try to
answer questions in a way that lets them know that your participation would
help the business succeed and grow instead of furthering your own needs.
During an interview, once, I asked an applicant why she
wanted to work for us.
What she said: I want to learn how to run a studio so that I
can open my own studio some day.
What I heard: I want you to train your future competition.
Once again, I felt like I was being coerced into buy a blue
car when what I really wanted was the champagne one.
Both the job applicant and the car salesman learned hard
lessons about the need for audience awareness in their careers. Had they
understood my needs/wants, the relationships might have ended successfully for
all of us. Instead, I declined both the car and the applicant.
I ended up hiring an amazing woman whose photographic eye
was magic, even though she had never taken a picture professionally. And her
customer service was unmatched. Our clients loved her, and she contributed
tremendously to the growth of the studio. She stayed with us for several years,
and she is still a dear friend.
I left the car dealership without a new car. I visited a
competitor a few days later, and they listened carefully to what I was saying.
They never tried to convince me that I needed something else; instead, they were
able to find the car for me out of state, and they arranged to have it
delivered to me. I left that dealership a very happy customer, and I drove my
little champagne Corolla for over 10 years.
Developing the ability to understand your audience will serve
you well in personal and professional relationships. The message and the
delivery have to fulfill the needs of the listener. We need to remember that it
really isn’t about us, after all.
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
Finding the Silver Lining in Unemployment
Unemployment is difficult, at best. There's the stress about money, the trauma of change, the chance for depression to slip in if one is not careful. It's just not a good time.
But during the past four months, I've also discovered a lot of positive things as a result of this extended time off, and I am starting to think of this as a very needed course correction.
First, there has to be a balance between work and life. For me, that's always been a tough thing. I find that my identify and feelings of self-worth are intricately tied to my work, which is not necessarily a bad thing UNLESS work becomes the predominant influence of those things. I am an 'all-in" kind of person, so, to be honest, I've not always managed the work-life balance as well as necessary because work became life.
Being away from that has helped me to understand that unemployment provides a forced break in the cycle. A chance for a new start. With the next job, I now have the benefit of hindsight and introspection, and I think I will give my all to my job, but I will give the same to my family but both in their own time.
Second, human interaction cannot be overrated. As anyone who has searched for jobs in the past decade knows, job hunting has become completely automated. Human beings are no longer a big factor. We fill out applications online. We get an automated receipt email. A few weeks later, we get an automated rejection email. Or if we do get past the initial electronic gatekeepers, we are offered a short phone interview with very canned questions (they really ask the same ones over and over). Or we receive absolutely nothing at all.
So on those very rare occasions when we can genuinely communicate with a person who uses our names or asks how we are, even if it is via email or phone, we are strikingly reminded of the value and importance of human interaction. I've sent several follow up emails to thank interviewers for their time, and often that has been the end of our communication. Today, I received three responses to my follow-ups from managers at one firm I interviewed with, and I was surprised at how good that made me feel. It's not about the job prospect. It's not about reading into the communication and trying to figure out what it all means. It's about decency, kindness, manners and human interaction. Unemployment is tough, but one short email simply says to the recipient that they were noticed and worthy of a response. And for job seekers, that means a lot.
Third, work expands to fit the time allotted. Once I got over the initial shock of being unemployed, I figured that I would use the time in between job searching to tackle projects I never had time to address while I was working. Go ahead. Fellow unemployed can laugh with me or at me. I find that I am as busy now as I was when I was working. The job search takes up an enormous amount of time. Additionally, I find myself playing with the pups, and running errands, and doing basic cleaning. In essence, I am doing all the things that I did while I was working, but it is just taking a lot longer to complete and I'm not even doing those things extra well. As for all those projects I wanted to tackle? Not a closet has been organized. Not a carpet has been cleaned. And my car has not been washed even once. There simply has been no time.
Finally, staying productive helps with staying positive. This one is intricately linked the the third point. There's a difference between staying busy (errands, housework, etc) and being productive (completing projects from start to finish). I did make a quilt and pillow shams for my bed, and I realized how good that made me feel AND how much that success fed my energy for doing other projects. So, I finally resorted to opening my planning journal last week, the same one I used to plan my time when I was working. It's been sitting on my desk for months, but I didn't see any real reason to use it. Until now. I start the week by making a "to do" list, including jobs to pursue, projects I want to tackle and cleaning/organizing chores that need to be done. I also use the time to plan for the future--wishes, hopes, long shot dreams. And I've found that it works. The daily chores get done and provide immediate gratification. The projects take time and energy but make me feel like I am accomplishing something. And the future items? Well they provide the reason for doing everything else. They are reminders that the steps I take today will lead me into tomorrow and beyond.
Being unemployed stinks, for sure. But since I have to live this experience for right now, I might as well try to find something positive in it.
Now I can check "write blog post" off my list, and I already feel the surge of energy from accomplishing something today. It's a win!
But during the past four months, I've also discovered a lot of positive things as a result of this extended time off, and I am starting to think of this as a very needed course correction.
First, there has to be a balance between work and life. For me, that's always been a tough thing. I find that my identify and feelings of self-worth are intricately tied to my work, which is not necessarily a bad thing UNLESS work becomes the predominant influence of those things. I am an 'all-in" kind of person, so, to be honest, I've not always managed the work-life balance as well as necessary because work became life.
Being away from that has helped me to understand that unemployment provides a forced break in the cycle. A chance for a new start. With the next job, I now have the benefit of hindsight and introspection, and I think I will give my all to my job, but I will give the same to my family but both in their own time.
Second, human interaction cannot be overrated. As anyone who has searched for jobs in the past decade knows, job hunting has become completely automated. Human beings are no longer a big factor. We fill out applications online. We get an automated receipt email. A few weeks later, we get an automated rejection email. Or if we do get past the initial electronic gatekeepers, we are offered a short phone interview with very canned questions (they really ask the same ones over and over). Or we receive absolutely nothing at all.
So on those very rare occasions when we can genuinely communicate with a person who uses our names or asks how we are, even if it is via email or phone, we are strikingly reminded of the value and importance of human interaction. I've sent several follow up emails to thank interviewers for their time, and often that has been the end of our communication. Today, I received three responses to my follow-ups from managers at one firm I interviewed with, and I was surprised at how good that made me feel. It's not about the job prospect. It's not about reading into the communication and trying to figure out what it all means. It's about decency, kindness, manners and human interaction. Unemployment is tough, but one short email simply says to the recipient that they were noticed and worthy of a response. And for job seekers, that means a lot.
Third, work expands to fit the time allotted. Once I got over the initial shock of being unemployed, I figured that I would use the time in between job searching to tackle projects I never had time to address while I was working. Go ahead. Fellow unemployed can laugh with me or at me. I find that I am as busy now as I was when I was working. The job search takes up an enormous amount of time. Additionally, I find myself playing with the pups, and running errands, and doing basic cleaning. In essence, I am doing all the things that I did while I was working, but it is just taking a lot longer to complete and I'm not even doing those things extra well. As for all those projects I wanted to tackle? Not a closet has been organized. Not a carpet has been cleaned. And my car has not been washed even once. There simply has been no time.
Finally, staying productive helps with staying positive. This one is intricately linked the the third point. There's a difference between staying busy (errands, housework, etc) and being productive (completing projects from start to finish). I did make a quilt and pillow shams for my bed, and I realized how good that made me feel AND how much that success fed my energy for doing other projects. So, I finally resorted to opening my planning journal last week, the same one I used to plan my time when I was working. It's been sitting on my desk for months, but I didn't see any real reason to use it. Until now. I start the week by making a "to do" list, including jobs to pursue, projects I want to tackle and cleaning/organizing chores that need to be done. I also use the time to plan for the future--wishes, hopes, long shot dreams. And I've found that it works. The daily chores get done and provide immediate gratification. The projects take time and energy but make me feel like I am accomplishing something. And the future items? Well they provide the reason for doing everything else. They are reminders that the steps I take today will lead me into tomorrow and beyond.
Being unemployed stinks, for sure. But since I have to live this experience for right now, I might as well try to find something positive in it.
Now I can check "write blog post" off my list, and I already feel the surge of energy from accomplishing something today. It's a win!
Thursday, May 19, 2016
I feel ya, Stannis Baratheon
Stannis Baratheon would understand.
I'm spending a lot of time listening to the radio as I finish retouching a huge set of images. I can tune out most of the drivel, but there is a Home Depot commercial that is driving me nuts.
Apparently, they are selling a new colored mulch. And it lasts a really long time. So long, in fact, that they proudly proclaim "that means less touch-ups."
I'm spending a lot of time listening to the radio as I finish retouching a huge set of images. I can tune out most of the drivel, but there is a Home Depot commercial that is driving me nuts.
Apparently, they are selling a new colored mulch. And it lasts a really long time. So long, in fact, that they proudly proclaim "that means less touch-ups."
At first I wondered
if I was I hearing that correctly. Surely a huge company with a huge
marketing department and huge budget would not release a spot with such a
simple usage error. Would it?
It would and it did. I've heard it multiple times now.
I suppose one could argue that Home Depot got my attention, and as any marketing person knows, even bad publicity is good. The problem is that this irritates me because it is so simplistic. And it makes me wonder why someone didn't catch it. Is good and proper communication that difficult, that much of a bother, or that irrelevant now?
Sigh.
Like Stannis Baratheon,* all I can do is mutter "fewer" under my breath every time I hear it.
Fewer.
It's really not that difficult.
*Game of Thrones fans will understand the reference from Season 5, "Kill the Boy"
It would and it did. I've heard it multiple times now.
I suppose one could argue that Home Depot got my attention, and as any marketing person knows, even bad publicity is good. The problem is that this irritates me because it is so simplistic. And it makes me wonder why someone didn't catch it. Is good and proper communication that difficult, that much of a bother, or that irrelevant now?
Sigh.
Like Stannis Baratheon,* all I can do is mutter "fewer" under my breath every time I hear it.
Fewer.
It's really not that difficult.
*Game of Thrones fans will understand the reference from Season 5, "Kill the Boy"
Communication Skills 101
Communication is the key to, well, everything. We use
it to ask parents for money, to order fries at the drive through, to apply to
colleges, to shine in a job application, and to work with our colleagues. My
parents have a unique way of communicating since my dad is very hard of
hearing, but they make it work. The bottom line, though, is that we all know
how to communicate.
But how well? Good communication is very different
from communication. Take for example, again, my parents. My mom asked my dad
today whether or not he would ever like a Kindle. He looked at her and asked
her what she thought was simple. Technically, they communicated, but clearly
they didn’t communicate well.
In business, good communication skills are vital to meeting objectives. Unfortunately, though, too often, we focus on what we want to say
instead of being aware of what the recipient needs to receive or what we need them to understand.
Recently, I applied for a job. My procedure is to copy
the job announcement and to put it in a spreadsheet. I then isolate each required
or desired skill or experience and the line descriptions of the daily
responsibilities. Then, I measure my experience or education with those. If I
am at least an 85% match, I will apply.
I found a job, and my match rate was around 95%, so I
applied. The next week, I got an email thanking me for my application but
indicating that they were pursuing candidates whose skills more closely matched
the job.
Now, for the sake of argument, we might say that they
had several good candidates whose skills were a 96% or better match. But that’s probably unlikely (not to mention risky HR decision-making).
We can suggest that my resume didn’t include the right
keywords for the automated readers, although I generally use the language in
the job announcements to complete the resumes just for this reason.
More likely, I suspect, is that what they wrote in the
announcement didn’t actually reflect what they wanted in a candidate. While I was very qualified for the job they announced, I probably was not qualified for the position they wanted to fill.
They probably knew
what they wanted, and they thought that they explained it, but they fell short.
They've shifted responsibility for good communication from them to the recipient, and that is simply not smart. I’ve heard it over and over again from students whose papers received low
grades. When I explain that the work didn’t reflect what they really were
trying to communicate, they reply, “but you know what I meant.”
Well, no. No, I didn’t.
As a writer, it is your
responsibility to write with me in mind. Literally. If you want to convince me
to vote for your candidate, you need to envision me as a voter sitting with you
and resisting your argument. You’ll write for me that way.
If you are an employer seeking to fill a position,
you need to imagine me sitting next to you, completely unfamiliar with you,
your company or the position, while you explain to me carefully what you need
to see in me to make a match.
And, if you are a job seeker, you will complete the cover letter and resume with the employer in mind. Think about what he or she needs to see, hear, and understand. Write with a person other than yourself in mind.
And, if you are a job seeker, you will complete the cover letter and resume with the employer in mind. Think about what he or she needs to see, hear, and understand. Write with a person other than yourself in mind.
Good communication requires remembering this very
important fact: it’s not about YOU.
Seriously. You can communicate all you want and as well as you want, but
if you don’t reach ME, the recipient, you might as well have skipped the effort
completely.
Good communication requires two parties: the sender and the receiver. (I know if you are a communications academic, you will argue that there are more parts, which is true, but we'll touch on those things later. Here, I'm simply reducing to essentials.) As the sender, your message can only be successful if it resonates with the receiver. If it is clear and understood by the receiver. If it speaks to the receiver.
If you want your receiver to buy a Kindle, you've got to understand his needs, his level of understanding about Kindles and what you need to do to ensure that he receives that message accurately. It's your job to deliver the clearest message you can if you want to have meaningful communication. It really is that simple.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)